Mark S. Haughwout
Professional Photography

  Models      Sports   

Contact    Weddings




Take Better Photos

Flagstaff Photographer Mark S. Haughwout is also a Photography skills teacher offering private photography workshops.


Here is some technical information to help you take better photos with your DSLR


How to shoot Lunar Eclipses


Lunar eclipse on September 28, 2015 as seen rising over Sunset Crater near Flagstaff Arizona.  This sequence was shot by photographer Mark Haughwout

Lunar Eclipse of the Super Moon rising over Sunset Crater on September 27, 2015


In this picture above I captured a sequence of 10 photos and merged them in Photoshop.  

Here's how to get this shot:

First scout a location for a pleasing landscape feature and using a GPS and computer figure out where to stand to get the proper angle.

The moon rises in different locations every night.  This night it rose at 97 degrees (2 degrees south of due east).



HDR became popular some years back, but with today's excellent sensors, a single RAW file can usually produce similar stunning results.

HDR is basically a process of taking multiple pictures of the exact same thing with different exposure settings and then combining them into one file. 


What this does is give the Photographer or Photo editor more latitude with adjustments to the image. 

This can be great for high contrast scenes. 

The new HDR image will have enough information in the highlight and shadow areas to allow for bringing out details in those areas.


However, today's RAW files already have plenty of info for most situations to deal with shadow and highlights, especially if the photographer errs on the side of under exposure.

It is important to not blow out the highlight areas (If any part of the picture - especially the sky - is pure white, it cannot adjusted since there is no information there).


Here are some examples from a Wedding I photographed in 2015 at Lipan Point on the south rim of the Grand Canyon at Sunset:


Unprocessed RAW file of a wedding photographed at the Grand Canyon

unprocessed RAW file

RAW file with auto adjustments only of the same photograph of the wedding at the Grand Canyon

Auto button only

RAW flle with auto setting and advanced adjustments of the same photograph of the wedding at the Grand Canyon

Auto Button plus other adjustments


The photograph on the left is an unprocessed RAW file.  No adjustments were made.

The middle and the right photograph were adjusted only in Adobe Camera RAW

The photograph in the middle was opened in Adobe Camera RAW and then I only pushed the Auto Adjustments button which affects lighting.

Notice all the detail that was available in both the shadow and highlight areas.

The photograph on the right got additional adjustments of clarity, vibrance, saturation and sharpening.  I also hit the lens correction button.

All the photographs were then saved directly from Adobe Camera RAW as JPEGS without opening in Photoshop.

Next I opened the JPEGS in Photoshop to shrink them and compress them further in order to make them fit this web page and load quickly.


If I chose to use HDR in this scenario, I would have been able to get even brighter detail in the Canyon BUT it would be a disaster, and here's why:

For HDR I need a completely still subject, however the wind was blowing causing not only the bride's hair to blow, but also swaying the couple slightly.


If I really wanted more detail in the Canyon, I can get a little more out of the RAW file like this:


Highly edited RAW file of a wedding at the Grand Canyon


To accomplish the look in this picture I used the adjustment brush to select just the Canyon and then improve the lighting and detail only in that area.

All of these photographs were saved as JPEGs, but this one had to be further compressed in Photoshop's Save For Web feature, otherwise it would be about 8 times larger in file size.

The advanced editing in Adobe Camera RAW resulted in a huge JPEG file compared to the basic editing in the first three wedding photos above.


Bottom line RAW v HDR:

I personally have no use for HDR.  I can get similarly stunning results out of a RAW image with a lot less work and none of the fake look that HDR images are prone to have.

IF you insist on HDR, only use it on a still scenes with no people or movement in it. Be sure to have a tripod and remote shutter release.



I also recorded the same file in my camera as a Large JPEG:


Large JPEG of a wedding at the Grand Canyon


As you can see the JPEG file above lacks the shadow detail of the processed RAW versions.

The bride and groom also appear darker.

However this JPEG is much better than the UNPROCESSED RAW file.

So if you don't want to take time to process RAW files, it is best just to shoot JPEGs.


Incidentally I did have the Auto Lighting Optimizer on my Canon 6D turned all the way up for this JPEG.

If I didn't use the ALO, the JPEG would be even darker in the shadow details.

The JPEG version is still a nice picture, but it is not fantastic like the highly processed RAW file above.


As a Photo Editor I could have worked with the JPEG file to bring out some more detail in the shadow area, but I just couldn't push it as far as the RAW file.

And besides, if I'm going to take the time to do such editing, I might as well have the latitude that a RAW file offers.


Banding / Posterization

If you enlarge the photos above on your computer screen, you will notice banding in the sky of the JPEG file that does not happen in the first three RAW files.

(It does happen some in the last version of the RAW file because I over compressed it for the web).

This is called Posterization - from the word 'poster'.  It can happen for two reasons:

1.  'pushing' the photo too far when editing

2. compressing the file too heavily


Finally, before someone calls me out on it.... ALL of these pictures above are now JPEGS, it's just that the first 4 started out as RAW files.


Okay, Okay, already!  That's not true either... technically they ALL started out as RAW files, but the last one the camera turned into a JPEG before recording it onto the memory card!


If at this point you are thoroughly confused, you should probably just shoot JPEGs!  At least until you contact me for a private photography workshop.


The Benefit of Shooting RAW - More Color Information


Here is another example of the advantages of shooting in RAW.

The first version is the unedited JPEG capture, the next picture is after editing the JPEG.  The final picture is an edited version of the RAW file.


Unedited JPEG version of a Picture of the Grand Canyon in bad weather   The edited version of the JPEG to the left.   The edited RAW file of the Grand Canyon

These three pictures are just versions of the same photograph.  I took this photograph near Lipan Point in the Grand Canyon on a dreary, rainy day.

I took the photo with my Camera set to record a Large JPEG and a Large RAW file at the same time.

I edited the JPEG and the RAW file in Adobe Camera Raw. 

As you can see, I was able to make the colors much more vibrant by editing from the RAW file.

I was also able to reduce the noise in the photo better from the RAW file as well as performing better sharpening.


RAW v JPEG Summary:

If you are going to do heavy editing on your photos, I highly recommend shooting in RAW. 

When I photograph outdoor weddings, such as a wedding at the Grand Canyon, I shoot in both RAW and in JPEG.

I save the RAW files for editing and use the JPEGS for client proofs.

RAW files are about 3x as large as L-JPEGS and are therefore more difficult to transfer, take more drive space to store and are impossible to send via email.

RAW format is completely unaffected by camera settings such as the ALO discussed above or by White Balance settings.

A RAW file is only the information gathered by the camera sensor BEFORE being processed by the camera computer.

JPEG files on the other hand are compressed versions of RAW files and are affected by all the camera settings.

JPEGS are great for snapshots.

Professionals also shoot JPEGS for sporting events, weddings and other situations where large numbers of pictures will be taken.


About 16 bit, 14 bit, 11 bit

This is perphaps the most misunderstood aspect of today's DSLR cameras.

A 'bit' has a value of either 0 or 1. Thus a 1 bit photo has only two colors: pure black and pure white.

The number of colors that can be recorded by a camera is 2 to the power of the bit number.

A sixteen bit photo has this many colors: 2^16 or 2x2x2x2x2x2x2x2x2x2x2x2x2x2x2x2 or 65,536 per channel (Red, Green and Blue).

Since there are three color channels, that atual number of colors available in a 16 bit photo is 2^48

Canon DSLRs shoot at 14bit per channel thus 42bits total or almost 4.4 TRILLION colors!

Sony also shoots at 14bit in uncompressed RAW but for Compressed RAW, it compresses it down to 11bit - less than 8.6 Billion colors. 

In other words a Canon RAW file can have almost 500x more color info than a Sony compressed RAW file.... in theory.

But can you notice the difference between billions of colors and trillions of colors?  Probably not,

But having more color information allows for more ability to manipulate the photo in editing programs, provided that you edit in 16bit and in ProPhoto setting (not in sRGB or Adobe RGB).





Commercial Photography


Home Landscapes About
Models News Stories


Family Portraits Product Photography Info for Models
Portraits/Headshots Real Estate Photography Rates
Sports Photography  


This website and all content Copyright 2023 Dark Sky Enterprises, LLC. - all rights reserved - Copyright info

Dark Sky Enterprises, LLC. - d.b.a. Mark S. Haughwout /